User account menu

  • Log in
Home
Theoretical Spectroscopy Group

Main navigation

  • Home
  • People
    • Andrea Cucca
    • Christine Giorgetti
    • Francesco Sottile
    • Lucia Reining
    • Matteo Gatti
    • Valerie Veniard
    • Vitaly Gorelov
      • Fatema Mohamed
      • Kevin Leveque-Simon
      • Felana Andriambelaza
      • Maram Ali Ahmed Musa
      • Sarbajit Dutta
      • Marc Aichner
      • Carlos Rodriguez Perez
      • Jean Goossaert
      • Niklas Penner
    • Former Members
  • How to Reach Us
  • Research
    • Strong Correlation
    • Plasmons and EELS
    • Developments in TDDFT
    • Excitons and Exciton Dispersion
    • Larger Public
    • Low dimensional materials
    • Non-linear Optics
    • Scientific goals and main achievements
    • Theory Developments
    • Software
    • Publications
    • Thesis
  • Training
  • ETSF Events

Solution to the many-body problem in one point

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Solution to the many-body problem in one point
Author
J Berger
P. Romaniello
Falk Tandetzky
Bernardo Mendoza
Christian Brouder
Lucia Reining
Keywords
paper
theory
Abstract

In this work we determine the one-body Green s function as solution of a set of functional integro-differential equations, which relate the one-particle Green s function to its functional derivative with respect to an external potential. In the same spirit as Lani et al (2012 New J. Phys. 14 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/1/013056] 013056 ), we do this in a one-point model, where the equations become ordinary differential equations (DEs) and, hence, solvable with standard techniques. This allows us to analyze several aspects of these DEs as well as of standard methods for determining the one-body Green s function that are important for real systems. In particular: (i) we present a strategy to determine the physical solution among the many mathematical solutions; (ii) we assess the accuracy of an approximate DE related to the $\#$$\#$IMG$\#$$\#$ [http://ej.iop.org/images/1367-2630/16/11/113025/njp503025ieqn1.gif] $GW$ +cumulant method by comparing it to the exact physical solution and to standard approximations such as $\#$$\#$IMG$\#$$\#$ [http://ej.iop.org/images/1367-2630/16/11/113025/njp503025ieqn2.gif] $GW$ ; (iii) we show that the solution of the approximate DE can be improved by combining it with a screened interaction in the random-phase approximation. (iv) We demonstrate that by iterating the $\#$$\#$IMG$\#$$\#$ [http://ej.iop.org/images/1367-2630/16/11/113025/njp503025ieqn3.gif] $GW$ Dyson equation one does not always converge to a $\#$$\#$IMG$\#$$\#$ [http://ej.iop.org/images/1367-2630/16/11/113025/njp503025ieqn4.gif] $GW$ solution and we discuss which iterative scheme is the most suitable to avoid such errors.

Year of Publication
2014
Journal
New Journal of Physics
Volume
16
Number of Pages
113025
URL
http://stacks.iop.org/1367-2630/16/i=11/a=113025
Download citation
  • Google Scholar
  • BibTeX
  • RIS

Developed & Designed by Alaa Haddad. Customized by ETSF Palaiseau © 2025.